From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mihalko v. Charlton

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)

Opinion

2012-02-10

In the Matter of Timothy D. MIHALKO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Cheri CHARLTON, Respondent–Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Paul G. Buchanan, J.), entered October 4, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order awarded sole custody of the parties' child to petitioner.David J. Pajak, Alden, for respondent-appellant. Avery S. Olson, Attorney for the Child, Jamestown, for Timothy J.M.


Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Paul G. Buchanan, J.), entered October 4, 2010 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order awarded sole custody of the parties' child to petitioner.David J. Pajak, Alden, for respondent-appellant. Avery S. Olson, Attorney for the Child, Jamestown, for Timothy J.M.

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs as moot ( see Matter of Graham v. Thering, 55 A.D.3d 1319, 1320, 865N.Y.S.2d 799, lv. denied 11 N.Y.3d 714, 873 N.Y.S.2d 269, 901 N.E.2d 763; Matter of Krest v. Kawczynski, 9 A.D.3d 907, 907–908, 779 N.Y.S.2d 384).

SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, and MARTOCHE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mihalko v. Charlton

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Feb 10, 2012
92 A.D.3d 1230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
Case details for

Mihalko v. Charlton

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Timothy D. MIHALKO, Petitioner–Respondent, v. Cheri…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Feb 10, 2012

Citations

92 A.D.3d 1230 (N.Y. App. Div. 2012)
937 N.Y.S.2d 910
2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 1023