From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Midfirst Bank v. Daniels

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jul 9, 2018
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-757 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2018)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-757

07-09-2018

MIDFIRST BANK v. ROBERT DANIELS, ET AL.


(Judge Schell/Judge Nowak) MEMORANDUM ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Came on for consideration the report of the United States Magistrate Judge in this action, this matter having been heretofore referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. On May 23, 2018, the report of the Magistrate Judge (Dkt. #21) was entered containing proposed findings of fact and recommendations that Plaintiff MidFirst Bank's Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendants Robert Daniels and Cora Daniels ("Defendants") (Dkt. #19) be granted and that final default judgment be entered for Plaintiff.

Having received the report of the Magistrate Judge, and no objections thereto having been timely filed, the court is of the opinion that the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge are correct and adopts the Magistrate Judge's report as the findings and conclusions of the court.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment (Dkt. #19) is GRANTED and a final default judgment shall be entered for Plaintiff.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SIGNED this the 9th day of July, 2018.

/s/_________

RICHARD A. SCHELL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Midfirst Bank v. Daniels

United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Jul 9, 2018
Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-757 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2018)
Case details for

Midfirst Bank v. Daniels

Case Details

Full title:MIDFIRST BANK v. ROBERT DANIELS, ET AL.

Court:United States District Court EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

Date published: Jul 9, 2018

Citations

Civil Action No. 4:17-CV-757 (E.D. Tex. Jul. 9, 2018)