From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Middleton v. Middleton

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 1, 2022
642 S.W.3d 317 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

WD 84338

03-01-2022

Heather Lynn MIDDLETON, Respondent, v. Steven Dale MIDDLETON, Appellant.

Judy R. Ullmann, for Respondent. Steven D. Middleton, Appellant Pro-se.


Judy R. Ullmann, for Respondent.

Steven D. Middleton, Appellant Pro-se.

Division Two: Alok Ahuja, Presiding Judge, Edward R. Ardini, Jr., Judge and Janet L. Sutton, Judge

ORDER

PER CURIAM: In 2009, the Circuit Court of Vernon County entered a judgment dissolving the marriage of Appellant Steven Middleton and Respondent Heather Middleton. Neither party appealed the judgment. In 2019, Steven Middleton filed a pro se "Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction," claiming he and Heather Middleton had never obtained a marriage license and thus "there was never a lawful marriage." The trial court denied this motion. Over one year later, Steven Middleton filed a motion to set aside the judgment "for reason of fraud upon the court," again asserting he and Heather Middleton had never been lawfully married. The trial court denied that motion as well. Steven Middleton appeals. Finding no error, we affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Middleton v. Middleton

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.
Mar 1, 2022
642 S.W.3d 317 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Middleton v. Middleton

Case Details

Full title:Heather Lynn MIDDLETON, Respondent, v. Steven Dale MIDDLETON, Appellant.

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

Date published: Mar 1, 2022

Citations

642 S.W.3d 317 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)