From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Middle E. Export Co. v. Concordia Lines

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Sep 27, 1972
71 Misc. 2d 365 (N.Y. App. Term 1972)

Opinion

September 27, 1972

Appeal from the Civil Court of the City of New York, County of New York, LEONARD H. SANDLER, J.

Anthony B. Cataldo for Middle East Export Co., plaintiff.

Haight, Gardner, Poor Havens ( M.E. DeOrchis and Ara A. Shimshidian of counsel), for Concordia Lines, defendant and third-party plaintiff.

Dougherty, Ryan, Mahoney, Pellegrino Giuffra ( Robert J. Giuffra of counsel), for American Stevedores, Inc., defendant and third-party defendant.


Third-party defendant American Stevedores, Inc. was chargeable solely with the reasonable value of the legal services rendered on behalf of the shipowner, defendant and third-party plaintiff, Concordia Lines, in the defense of plaintiff's action, as distinguished from the legal services rendered in prosecuting shipowner's third-party claim. Said defendant conceded at all times its liability to plaintiff for the $2,000 provided in the bill of lading provision for limitation of liability and found by the court. Plaintiff did not seriously dispute such limitation of liability on the part of said defendant, the action really involving its claim for full liability in the action instituted by it against the stevedore, American Stevedores, Inc. The preponderant effect of the legal services rendered on behalf of the shipowner was in furtherance of its third-party claim against the stevedore, which was vigorously contested as to all issues by the stevedore. On that basis, the finding below of $3,250 for the reasonable value of legal services rendered the shipowner, chargeable to the stevedore, allocated and limited to the defense of plaintiff's action, is viewed as excessive. In light of all the circumstances, the reasonable value of such services is fixed at $2,000.

We have examined the other points raised by both appellants and affirm the judgment in all other respects.

The judgment should be modified by reducing third-party plaintiff's recovery for attorneys' fees to $2,000, with interest from April 30, 1969 and, as modified, affirmed, with $25 costs to defendant and third-party defendant as against plaintiff.

Concur — MARKOWITZ, J.P., GOLD and STREIT, JJ.

Judgment modified, etc.


Summaries of

Middle E. Export Co. v. Concordia Lines

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Sep 27, 1972
71 Misc. 2d 365 (N.Y. App. Term 1972)
Case details for

Middle E. Export Co. v. Concordia Lines

Case Details

Full title:MIDDLE EAST EXPORT CO., Appellant-Respondent, v. CONCORDIA LINES…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Sep 27, 1972

Citations

71 Misc. 2d 365 (N.Y. App. Term 1972)
336 N.Y.S.2d 217

Citing Cases

Stein Hall Co. v. S.S. Concordia Viking

The court below based its conclusion that all New York cargo from Port Sudan was discharged in Newark on the…

Miller Export Corp. v. Hellenic Lines, Ltd.

That proposition, at least as a general matter, also finds support in the case law. See, e.g., Atlantic…