Opinion
2014-05-16
Richard D. MICKMAN, Appellee v. Elaine MICKMAN, Appellant. Richard D. Mickman, Appellee v. Elaine Mickman, Appellant.
No. 71 MAP 2013, Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, dated December 27, 2012, at No. 1776 EDA 2011, denying the reconsideration of its Order, dated October 18, 2012, affirming the Decree of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, dated June 21, 2011, at No. 2003–06252. No. 72 MAP 2013, Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, dated December 27, 2012, at No. 2213 EDA 2011, denying the reconsideration of its Order, dated October 18, 2012, affirming the Order of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, dated July 19, 2011, at No. 2003–06252, Arthur R. Tilson, J. Rebecca Lynn Bell, Esq., for Elaine Mickman. William H. Lamb, Esq., James C. Sargent, Jr., Esq., Lamb McErlane, PC, West Chester, Jack A. Rounick, Esq., Norristown, for Richard Mickman.
No. 71 MAP 2013, Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, dated December 27, 2012, at No. 1776 EDA 2011, denying the reconsideration of its Order, dated October 18, 2012, affirming the Decree of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, dated June 21, 2011, at No. 2003–06252.
No. 72 MAP 2013, Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court, dated December 27, 2012, at No. 2213 EDA 2011, denying the reconsideration of its Order, dated October 18, 2012, affirming the Order of the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division, dated July 19, 2011, at No. 2003–06252, Arthur R. Tilson, J.
Rebecca Lynn Bell, Esq., for Elaine Mickman. William H. Lamb, Esq., James C. Sargent, Jr., Esq., Lamb McErlane, PC, West Chester, Jack A. Rounick, Esq., Norristown, for Richard Mickman.
BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., and SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY and STEVENS, JJ.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is dismissed as having been IMPROVIDENTLY GRANTED.