From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mickelson v. Cnty. of Ramsey

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 17, 2017
137 S. Ct. 1578 (2017)

Summary

rejecting the categorical assertion that only pre-deprivation procedures can satisfy due process

Summary of this case from Lunon v. Botsford

Opinion

No. 16–543.

04-17-2017

Erik MICKELSON, et al., petitioners, v. COUNTY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA, et al.


Motion of Professor Alexes Harris for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit denied.


Summaries of

Mickelson v. Cnty. of Ramsey

Supreme Court of the United States
Apr 17, 2017
137 S. Ct. 1578 (2017)

rejecting the categorical assertion that only pre-deprivation procedures can satisfy due process

Summary of this case from Lunon v. Botsford
Case details for

Mickelson v. Cnty. of Ramsey

Case Details

Full title:Erik MICKELSON, et al., petitioners, v. COUNTY OF RAMSEY, MINNESOTA, et al.

Court:Supreme Court of the United States

Date published: Apr 17, 2017

Citations

137 S. Ct. 1578 (2017)
197 L. Ed. 2d 735

Citing Cases

Lunon v. Botsford

We agree with the Supreme Court of Arkansas that affirmative pre-deprivation notice is not constitutionally…