From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michelotti v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 3, 2014
2013-5131 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 3, 2014)

Opinion

2013-5131

03-03-2014

PAUL MICHELOTTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States Court of Federal

Claims in No. 13-CV-0029, Chief Judge Emily C. Hewitt.


ON PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

Before NEWMAN, LOURIE, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.

ORDER

A petition for panel rehearing having been filed by the appellant, and the matter having been referred to the panel that heard the appeal,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The petition for rehearing is DENIED, except that the portion of the opinion at page 7, lines 9-18, is replaced with the following:

Apr. 23, 2013), ECF No. 8, he never tied those studies to his patent infringement claim or alleged how the studies showed infringement when he mentioned them indirectly and in passing in his motion to amend. Thus, the Court of Federal Claims had no fair opportunity to consider Mr. Michelotti's new allegation. We note that the single document from the studies that he attached to his response to the motion to dismiss describes only government simulations of enhanced brake lighting systems, not any actual systems used or manufactured by or for the United States. See App. to Pl.'s Resp. to Mot. to Dismiss.

FOR THE COURT

________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk of Court
cc: Paul Michelotti
Sonia M. Orfield


Summaries of

Michelotti v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Mar 3, 2014
2013-5131 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 3, 2014)
Case details for

Michelotti v. United States

Case Details

Full title:PAUL MICHELOTTI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Mar 3, 2014

Citations

2013-5131 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 3, 2014)