From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michaels v. U.S. Tennis Assn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 2002
295 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

1027

June 20, 2002.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Kenneth Thompson, Jr., J.), entered January 15, 2002, which granted defendants' motion to resettle the judgment entered September 25, 2001 so as to toll the running of interest on the judgment from July 11, 2000 until the date of entry of the resettled judgment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and defendants' motion denied.

SCOTT N. SINGER, for Plaintiff-appellant.

VANESSA M. CORCHIA CHARLES T. GLAWS, for Defendants-respondents.

Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Ellerin, Marlow, Gonzalez, JJ.


Absent an unconditional tender of payment of a judgment, postjudgment interest continues to accrue (see generally, Cohen v. Transcontinental Insurance Co., 262 A.D.2d 189, 190-191; Matter of Jeffrey Towers v. Straus, 31 A.D.2d 319, 325 affd 26 N.Y.2d 812). Contrary to the motion court's finding, defendants' tender of payment in their July 11, 2000 letter was not unconditional in that, while it was offered "in full satisfaction of the judgment", it required a discussion of "the terms of such payment". Moreover, no check or other form of payment for the amount due was ever tendered until the return date of defendants' resettlement motion.

Motion seeking stay pending appeal denied as academic.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.


Summaries of

Michaels v. U.S. Tennis Assn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 20, 2002
295 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Michaels v. U.S. Tennis Assn

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT MICHAELS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE UNITED STATES TENNIS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 20, 2002

Citations

295 A.D.2d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
744 N.Y.S.2d 375

Citing Cases

Liberatore v. Olivieri Development

Victor Liberatore, Sr., and Victor Liberatore, Jr. (plaintiffs) appeal from an order of County Court entered…

Lancer Ins. v. Removal

Accordingly, the subject policy did not provide a mechanism for the extinguishment of the plaintiffs…