From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Michael Grecco Prods., Inc. v. Netease Info. Tech. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 30, 2018
CV 18-3119 DSF (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2018)

Opinion

CV 18-3119 DSF (RAOx)

10-30-2018

MICHAEL GRECCO PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETEASE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.


JUDGMENT

The Court having ordered that the complaint be dismissed for improper venue as to both Defendants, and Plaintiff having failed to amend its complaint in the time allowed by the Court,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed without prejudice, and that Defendants recover their costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920. Date: October 30, 2018

/s/_________

Dale S. Fischer

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Michael Grecco Prods., Inc. v. Netease Info. Tech. Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 30, 2018
CV 18-3119 DSF (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Michael Grecco Prods., Inc. v. Netease Info. Tech. Corp.

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL GRECCO PRODUCTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. NETEASE INFORMATION…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 30, 2018

Citations

CV 18-3119 DSF (RAOx) (C.D. Cal. Oct. 30, 2018)

Citing Cases

Will Co. v. Doe

The Court finds Plaintiff has not met the second prong of the purposeful direction test; therefore, the Court…

Will Co v. Doe

The Court finds Plaintiff has not met the second prong of the purposeful direction test; therefore, the Court…