Summary
In Mich Pipe, a contractor installed a test well in order to obtain a water sample from the aquifer below the subject property.
Summary of this case from E.T. Mackenzie Co. v. Sutton Place-Raisin Twp. L.L.C.Opinion
Docket No. 143231.COA No. 294530.
2011-09-26
MICHIGAN PIPE & VALVE–LANSING, INC., Plaintiff/Counter Defendant–Appellee,v.HEBELER ENTERPRISES, INC., Windy Pines View, L.L.C., William B. Chunko, Heather M. Chunko, and Clinton County Treasurer, Defendant/Cross–Defendants,andFirstbank–St. Johns, Defendant/Cross–Defendant–Appellant,andGrand River Infrastructure, Inc., Defendant/Counter–Plaintiff/Cross–Plaintiff/Third–Party Plaintiff–Appellee,andBruce Hebeler, Third–Party Defendant.
Order
On order of the Court, the motion to dismiss is DENIED. The application for leave to appeal the May 3, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.