From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Micenheimer v. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
CV 13-3853-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion

          Cory Dwayne Micenheimer, Plaintiff, Pro se


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          CORMAC J. CARNEY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         In accordance with the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge filed concurrently herewith, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Micenheimer v. Soto

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Mar 31, 2015
CV 13-3853-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Micenheimer v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN SOTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

CV 13-3853-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)