From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Micenheimer v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2015
Case No. CV 13-3853-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. CV 13-3853-CJC (JEM)

03-31-2015

CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN SOTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. No Objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed within the time allowed for Objections. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing this action without prejudice. DATED: March 31, 2015

/s/_________

CORMAC J. CARNEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Micenheimer v. Soto

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 31, 2015
Case No. CV 13-3853-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)
Case details for

Micenheimer v. Soto

Case Details

Full title:CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, Plaintiff, v. JOHN SOTO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 31, 2015

Citations

Case No. CV 13-3853-CJC (JEM) (C.D. Cal. Mar. 31, 2015)