From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MHL Custom, Inc. v. Waydoo U.S., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Apr 30, 2024
No. 2024-1036 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2024)

Opinion

2024-1036

04-30-2024

MHL CUSTOM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. WAYDOO USA, INC., SHENZHEN WAYDOO INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Defendants-Appellants


This order is nonprecedential.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in No. 1:21-cv-00091-RGA, Judge Richard G. Andrews.

Before DYK, WALLACH, and CUNNINGHAM, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

ORDER

WALLACH, CIRCUIT JUDGE.

Waydoo USA, Inc. and Shenzhen Waydoo Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. (collectively, "Waydoo") move to dismiss their appeal. MHL Custom, Inc. opposes the motion. Waydoo replies.

We grant the motion because we agree that the judgment is non-final.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) The stay is lifted.
(2) The motion to dismiss is granted.
(3) Each party shall bear its own costs.


Summaries of

MHL Custom, Inc. v. Waydoo U.S., Inc.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Apr 30, 2024
No. 2024-1036 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2024)
Case details for

MHL Custom, Inc. v. Waydoo U.S., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MHL CUSTOM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee v. WAYDOO USA, INC., SHENZHEN WAYDOO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Apr 30, 2024

Citations

No. 2024-1036 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 30, 2024)

Citing Cases

Wirtgen Am. v. Caterpillar, Inc.

See, e.g., MHL Custom, Inc. v. Waydoo USA, Inc., No. CV 21-0091-RGA, 2023 WL 5805889, at *7 (D. Del. Sept.…