From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 4, 2004
884 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Summary

holding that violation of section 800.04, Florida Statutes — a second-degree felony — did not result in sexual predator designation when defendant had no prior violations

Summary of this case from Lupianez v. State

Opinion

No. 2D03-4292.

August 4, 2004.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pasco County; Wayne L. Cobb, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John C. Fisher, Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marilyn Muir Beccue, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


Richard A. Meyers appeals the order designating him as a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21(4)(a)(1), Florida Statutes (2001). He argues that he did not qualify for sexual predator designation and that the Florida Sexual Predator Act violates procedural due process. We agree that Meyers did not qualify for sexual predator designation and reverse.

Meyers was convicted of lewd and lascivious battery, a second-degree felony in violation of section 800.04(4), Florida Statutes (2001). An offender convicted of a violation of section 800.04 as a second-degree felony shall be designated a sexual predator if the offender has previously been convicted of or found to have committed, or pled nolo contendere or guilty to, regardless of adjudication, any of certain statutorily enumerated offenses. § 775.21(4)(a)(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2001); Garcia v. State, 827 So.2d 1102 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002); Nicholas v. State, 844 So.2d 826 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). The State admits that Meyers did not have the required previous offense. Therefore, we reverse the trial court's order and remand with directions to remove the sexual predator designation.

Our reversal of the trial court's order makes it unnecessary for us to address Meyers' argument that the Florida Sexual Predator Act violates procedural due process. However, we note that this court has previously held that the Act does not violate procedural due process. See Milks v. State, 848 So.2d 1167 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003), review granted, 859 So.2d 514 (Fla. 2003).

Reversed and remanded with directions.

SILBERMAN and KELLY, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Meyers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Aug 4, 2004
884 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

holding that violation of section 800.04, Florida Statutes — a second-degree felony — did not result in sexual predator designation when defendant had no prior violations

Summary of this case from Lupianez v. State
Case details for

Meyers v. State

Case Details

Full title:Richard A. MEYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Aug 4, 2004

Citations

884 So. 2d 219 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2004)

Citing Cases

Lupianez v. State

§ 775.21(4)(a)(1)(b), Fla. Stat. (2003); see also State v. J.M., 824 So.2d 105, 110 (Fla. 2002) ("[I]n cases…