From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyers v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2018
No. 2:16-cv-01121 MCE CKD (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:16-cv-01121 MCE CKD (PS)

10-03-2018

GLEN MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a federal prisoner, has requested the appointment of counsel. The undersigned notes that on June 19, 2018, the district judge granted a motion by plaintiff's former counsel to withdraw as counsel of record. (ECF No. 23.) Previously, on November 8, 2017, plaintiff had submitted a proposed substitution of attorney seeking to proceed pro se. (ECF No. 15.)

The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). In the present case, the court does not find the required exceptional circumstances at this time. //// ////

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel (ECF No. 29) is denied without prejudice to renewal. Dated: October 3, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2/meyers1121.counsel


Summaries of

Meyers v. Cnty. of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 3, 2018
No. 2:16-cv-01121 MCE CKD (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2018)
Case details for

Meyers v. Cnty. of Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:GLEN MEYERS, Plaintiff, v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 3, 2018

Citations

No. 2:16-cv-01121 MCE CKD (PS) (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2018)