From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Sherwood Automobile Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 11, 1924
123 Misc. 923 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)

Opinion

November 11, 1924.

Almy, Van Gordon Evans ( William S. Evans, of counsel), for the appellant.

Pitkin Rosensohn ( Samuel J. Rosensohn, of counsel), for the respondent.


The chattel having been sold under the judgment in the replevin action without notice to the conditional vendee as prescribed in section 66 of the Personal Property Law (Laws of 1909, chap. 45), the vendor is liable in accordance with section 65 of that statute, and it was unnecessary to prove the vendee's damages.

Judgment reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event.

All concur; present, GUY, BIJUR and MULLAN, JJ.


Summaries of

Meyer v. Sherwood Automobile Corp.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department
Nov 11, 1924
123 Misc. 923 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)
Case details for

Meyer v. Sherwood Automobile Corp.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY C. MEYER, Plaintiff, Appellant, v . SHERWOOD AUTOMOBILE CORPORATION…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department

Date published: Nov 11, 1924

Citations

123 Misc. 923 (N.Y. App. Term 1924)
206 N.Y.S. 645

Citing Cases

In re Angelus

Thereupon the court affirmed the issuance of an injunction in behalf of said owner. Bartsch v. Ragonetti, 123…