From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Parr Company of Suffolk, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1975
50 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

December 31, 1975


In two actions to foreclose separate mortgages on real property, in each of which an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, was made appointing a referee to compute the amount due plaintiffs, upon defendants' default in answering, defendants the Parr Company of Suffolk, Inc., and Suffolk Meadows Enterprises, Inc., appeal from separate orders (one in each action) of the same court, both entered October 2, 1975, which, inter alia, denied their respective motions to open their defaults. Orders affirmed, without costs. In our view, appellants failed to meet their burden of establishing excusable neglect and the existence of a meritorious defense. Consequently, Special Term did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions. Rabin, Acting P.J., Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Meyer v. Parr Company of Suffolk, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 31, 1975
50 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Meyer v. Parr Company of Suffolk, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MALCOLM MEYER et al., as Trustees, Respondents, v. PARR COMPANY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 31, 1975

Citations

50 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Vogel v. Asgrow Mandeville Company, Inc.

Special Term held that defendant offered no reasonable excuse for failure to file a change of address with…

Berlin v. New Hope Holiness Ch. of God, Inc.

Judgment of foreclosure and sale was granted on August 25, 1981. It was not until September 23, 1981 that the…