From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Owens et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 9, 1918
109 S.C. 111 (S.C. 1918)

Opinion

9903

February 9, 1918.

Before SHIPP, J., Richland, November 10, 1916. Affirmed.

Action by Eliza J. Meyer against Lawrence B. Owens and others. From an order refusing to strike a demurrer to the complaint, plaintiff appeals.

Mr. D.W. Robinson, for appellant, cites: As to joinder of causes of action: Code of Procedure, sec. 218; 70 S.C. 253; 29 S.C. 407, 412-13; 105 S.C. 80; 72 S.C. 387. As to right of trial by jury: Code of Civil Procedure, sec. 312; 23 S.C. 370; 43 S.C. 192; 37 S.C. 169. Frivolous pleadings: Code, sec. 306; 37 S.C. 607; 2 S.C. 427; Black's Law Dic. 526; 90 S.C. 160; 91 S.C. 864.

Messrs. Melton Belser, for respondents, cite: As to joinder of causes of action: Code, sec. 218; 23 Cyc. 428; 30 S.C. 114; 31 Cyc. 885-6-888-887; 23 Cyc. 431-432; 23 Tex. Civ. App. 504; 41 Mo. 274; 51 Kan. 617 (cited 1 Encyc. P. P. 209); 45 Iowa 315 (cited 1 Encyc. P. P. 209); 23 Cyc. 428; 29 S.C. 412-13; 70 S.C. 253. As to frivolous demurrer: 6 Ency. Pl. Pr. 685-7; 46 Minn. 208 (cited 6 Encyc. Pl. Pr., p. 387).


February 9, 1918. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


Plaintiff appeals from an order refusing to strike out a demurrer to the complaint as frivolous.

The order is not appealable. Some of the reasons why such an order is not appealable are set forth in the cases cited in Woodward v. Woodward, 87 S.C. 247, 69 S.E. 232. They need not be repeated here. The principal reason is that such an order does not affect the merits, and an appeal from it causes unnecessary delay in the determination of the merits.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Meyer v. Owens et al

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Feb 9, 1918
109 S.C. 111 (S.C. 1918)
Case details for

Meyer v. Owens et al

Case Details

Full title:MEYER v. OWENS ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Feb 9, 1918

Citations

109 S.C. 111 (S.C. 1918)
95 S.E. 344

Citing Cases

Green v. Atlanta C.A.L. Ry. Co. et al

Action by R.F. Green against the Atlanta Charlotte Air Line Railway Company and another. From an order…

Foster v. Roach

Messrs. Dunlap Dunlap, for appellant, cite: Affirmativedefense fails, the conditions precedent not having…