From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. George F. Cook Construction Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 31, 2005
705 N.W.2d 398 (Minn. 2005)

Opinion

No. A05-1475.

October 31, 2005.

Raymond R. Peterson, McCoy, Peterson Jorstad, Minneapolis, MN, for Relator.

Kim D. Amundson, Lynn, Scharfenberg Associates, Minneapolis, MN, for Respondent Cook and State Fund Mutual Insurance Company.

Ross K. Menk, The Law Offices of Powell Robinson, St. Paul, MN, for Respondent Gresser and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company.

Julie A. Williams, Law Office of Elizabeth Holden Hill, P.A., Minnetonka, MN, for Respondent Stellar.

Considered and decided by the court en banc.


ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed June 27, 2005, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (summary dispositions have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Kathleen A. Blatz

Chief Justice


Summaries of

Meyer v. George F. Cook Construction Company

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Oct 31, 2005
705 N.W.2d 398 (Minn. 2005)
Case details for

Meyer v. George F. Cook Construction Company

Case Details

Full title:Gary R. MEYER, Relator, v. GEORGE F. COOK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, and State…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Oct 31, 2005

Citations

705 N.W.2d 398 (Minn. 2005)

Citing Cases

Lewis v. Hickman

If the contract debt is usurious, any third person in interest may invoke the rule that the mortgagee is not…

Farmers Ginners Cotton Oil Company v. Hogan

Wailes v. Couch, 75 Ala. 134; Saltmarsh v. Tuthill, 13 Ala. 390; Clark v. Johnson, 133 Ala. 432, 31 So. 960.…