From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meyer v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Jan 21, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10cv386 (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 3:10cv386.

January 21, 2011


ORDER


By Order entered herein on December 10, 2010, the pending MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 15) was referred to Magistrate Judge M. Hannah Lauck for report and recommendation. Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 28) entered herein on January 5, 2011, and there being no timely filed objections thereto, and the time for filing objections having expired, and having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 28) is ADOPTED on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION.

It is further ORDERED that:

(1) the MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 15) is granted and the Complaint is dismissed with prejudice;

(2) the defendant's MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF MARVIN E. WINSTON (Docket No. 26) is denied as moot;

(3) the defendant's MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE REFERENCES TO KETCHUP, BARBEQUE SAUCE, AND CLEANING SOLUTION (Docket No. 24) is denied as moot; and

(4) the jury trial scheduled for 9:30 a.m. February 2, 2011 is cancelled.

The issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process.

It is so ORDERED.

Richmond, Virginia

Date: January 20, 2011


Summaries of

Meyer v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division
Jan 21, 2011
Civil Action No. 3:10cv386 (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Meyer v. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NAOMI A. MEYER, Plaintiff, v. BODDIE-NOELL ENTERPRISES, INC., d/b/a…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division

Date published: Jan 21, 2011

Citations

Civil Action No. 3:10cv386 (E.D. Va. Jan. 21, 2011)

Citing Cases

Dent v. Siegelbaum

The test is not whether the individual intended to engage in the action that led to the destruction of the…