From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metzger v. Gardencorner, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Opinion

April, 1931.

Present — Lazansky, P.J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ. Settle order on notice.


Judgment in so far as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs to each of the respondents against the appellants. In our opinion, upon the facts found by the trial justice, as stated in findings of fact numbered 25, 28, 29, 30, 33, 38, 39, 40 and 64, for which there is support in the evidence, plaintiffs are estopped from denying the right of defendant Gardencorner, Inc., to make the lease of store No. 3 to defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company for the sale therein, in connection with its general grocery, vegetable and meat business, of soda water in bottles, cake in small cartons selling for ten cents each and low priced candy specialties (fol. 225), and plaintiffs are not entitled to injunctive relief against Gardencorner, Inc., inasmuch as there is no evidence that defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company has sold or threatens to sell any other merchandise described in the negative covenant in plaintiffs' lease. The court found (fol. 329) that plaintiffs' lease was not recorded and there is no proof that defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company had actual or constructive notice of the covenant in plaintiffs' said lease until about April 12, 1929, in the form of a letter from the plaintiffs nearly two months after the execution and delivery of its lease of store No. 3, and after it had taken possession and expended nearly $10,000 in alterations and improvements, and it is, therefore not bound by the terms of said lease. ( Waldorf-Astoria Segar Co. v. Salomon, 109 App. Div. 65; Baumann Co. v. Manwit Corp., 213 id. 300; Vogeler v. Alwyn Improvement Corp., 247 N.Y. 131.) Finding of fact No. 28 in the decision of the trial court is modified by changing the date from February 13, 1929, to February 19, 1929, and proposed finding of fact No. 40 of defendant The Great Atlantic and Pacific Tea Company is found. Findings inconsistent with this decision are reversed.


Summaries of

Metzger v. Gardencorner, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1931
233 App. Div. 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)
Case details for

Metzger v. Gardencorner, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HENRY J. METZGER and HAROLD METZGER, Appellants, v. GARDENCORNER, INC.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1931

Citations

233 App. Div. 689 (N.Y. App. Div. 1931)

Citing Cases

Uttal's Leather Store, Inc., v. Odell

In these circumstances the corporate defendants may not be enjoined from the selling of ladies' leather…

Rappaport v. Raylen Realty Corp.

The movant does not seek, and the court could not restrain, Burke Avenue Food Market, Inc. from selling the…