From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metz v. Betzner

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 12, 1946
67 N.E.2d 860 (Ohio 1946)

Opinion

No. 30695

Decided June 12, 1946.

Supreme Court — Dismissal — No debatable constitutional question involved — Specific performance — Contract to convey real estate — Deed ordered executed with reciprocal easement for driveway — Taking property without due process of law.

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals of Hamilton county.

Mr. Bert H. Long, Mr. Milton M. Bloom and Messrs. Cowell Fletcher, for appellees Arthur H. Metz and Grace Metz.

Mr. Oliver G. Bailey and Mr. William M. Fridman, for appellees Daisy M. Betzner, Daisy Idella Sweeney and Clifford H. Sweeney.

Mr. Robert Adair Black and Mr. George A. Dornette, for appellants.


It is ordered and adjudged that this appeal as of right be, and the same hereby is, dismissed for the reason that no debatable constitutional question is involved.

Appeal dismissed.

WEYGANDT, C.J., ZIMMERMAN, WILLIAMS, TURNER, MATTHIAS and HART, JJ., concur.

BELL, J., not participating.


Summaries of

Metz v. Betzner

Supreme Court of Ohio
Jun 12, 1946
67 N.E.2d 860 (Ohio 1946)
Case details for

Metz v. Betzner

Case Details

Full title:METZ ET AL., APPELLEES v. BETZNER ET AL., APPELLANTS, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Ohio

Date published: Jun 12, 1946

Citations

67 N.E.2d 860 (Ohio 1946)
146 Ohio St. 700

Citing Cases

Central Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bradford-White Co.

See Civ. R. 41(B)(3). Since the dismissal was otherwise than on the merits, the parties were left in the same…