From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen Int'l Distribution, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 28, 2012
2011-1572 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 28, 2012)

Opinion

2011-1572 2012-1168 2012-1169

09-28-2012

METSO MINERALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POWERSCREEN INTERNATIONAL DISTRIBUTION, LIMITED, NOW KNOWN AS TEREX GB LIMITED, POWERSCREEN NEW YORK, INC., AND EMERALD EQUIPMENT SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants-Appellants, AND TEREX CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in case no. 06-CV-1446, Judge Arthur D. Spatt.

ON MOTION


Before DYK, Circuit Judge.


ORDER

Metso Minerals, Inc. moves for leave to file two separate response briefs or, in the alternative, to file an extended response brief of up to 23,000 words. Powerscreen International Distribution, Limited, Powerscreen New York, Inc., Emerald Equipment Systems. Inc. and Terex Corporation oppose the motion to file two separate response briefs but consent to the motion to file an extended response brief.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motions are denied. Metso Minerals, Inc.'s brief, not to exceed 14,000 words, is due within 21 days of the date of this order.

FOR THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk
cc: Michael C. Stuart, Esq.

Jon R. Trembath, Esq.

Vincent Alfieri, Esq.
s26


Summaries of

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen Int'l Distribution, Ltd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Sep 28, 2012
2011-1572 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 28, 2012)
Case details for

Metso Minerals, Inc. v. Powerscreen Int'l Distribution, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:METSO MINERALS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POWERSCREEN INTERNATIONAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Sep 28, 2012

Citations

2011-1572 (Fed. Cir. Sep. 28, 2012)