From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Metropolitan Dade County v. Espinosa

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 11, 1977
344 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Opinion

No. 76-613.

April 12, 1977. Rehearing Denied May 11, 1977.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, James W. Kehoe, J.

Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Davant, McMath O'Hara and Richard A. Sherman, Miami, for appellants.

Horton, Perse Ginsberg, Brumer, Moss, Cohen Rodgers, Miami, for appellees.

Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and NATHAN, JJ.


Since 1964 (in Florida) a jury has had a right to find that a driver who rear-ends a vehicle is free from negligence. Stark v. Vasquez, 168 So.2d 140 (Fla. 1964). This was true when our courts operated under the doctrine of contributory negligence and a plaintiff's negligence was a complete defense. It is likewise true today, when cases are tried on issues of comparative negligence. City of St. Petersburg v. Naden, 284 So.2d 15 (Fla. 2nd D.C.A. 1973); Thompson v. Jacobs, 314 So.2d 797 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1975); Petroleum Carrier Corporation v. Gates, 330 So.2d 751 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1976).

Finding evidence in the record to support the jury's verdict, no error has been made to appear. Vanzant v. Davies, 215 So.2d 504 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1968); Community Cabs, Inc. v. Grissett, 284 So.2d 707 (Fla. 1st D.C.A. 1973); Thompson v. Jacobs, supra. The final judgment is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Metropolitan Dade County v. Espinosa

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 11, 1977
344 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)
Case details for

Metropolitan Dade County v. Espinosa

Case Details

Full title:METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY TRANSIT AUTHORITY AND ROBERT HAMLETT, APPELLANTS…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 11, 1977

Citations

344 So. 2d 1290 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1977)

Citing Cases

Zelinski v. Purolator Courier Corp.

The evidence in the record supports the jury verdict. See Metropolitan Dade County Transit Authority v.…

Pierce v. Progressive American Co.

These statements read most favorably to Pierce, create a comparative negligence issue for the jury.See…