From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mesi v. Select Portfolio Servicing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 27, 2017
3:16-cv-00065-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jul. 27, 2017)

Opinion

3:16-cv-00065-RCJ-WGC

07-27-2017

ERIC MESI et al., Plaintiffs, v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING et al., Defendants.


ORDER

This case arises out of the foreclosure of real property. Plaintiffs have moved to remand the Complaint to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. But there is jurisdiction in this Court under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1441 based on the claims under the False Claims Act and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.

CONCLUSION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion to Remand (ECF No. 20) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 27th day of July, 2017.

/s/_________

ROBERT C. JONES

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Mesi v. Select Portfolio Servicing

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Jul 27, 2017
3:16-cv-00065-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jul. 27, 2017)
Case details for

Mesi v. Select Portfolio Servicing

Case Details

Full title:ERIC MESI et al., Plaintiffs, v. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Jul 27, 2017

Citations

3:16-cv-00065-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Jul. 27, 2017)