From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merz v. Merz

Florida District Court of Appeals
Feb 16, 2024
379 So. 3d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)

Opinion

No. 1D22-1001

02-16-2024

Johnathan D. MERZ, Appellant, v. Harmony L. MERZ, Appellee.

Johnathan D. Merz, pro se, Appellant. Harmony L. Merz, pro se, Appellee.


On appeal from the Circuit Court for Levy County. Craig C. DeThomasis, Judge.

Johnathan D. Merz, pro se, Appellant.

Harmony L. Merz, pro se, Appellee.

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Williams v. Williams, 152 So. 3d 702, 704 (Fla. 1st DCA 2014) ("[W]here an error by the court appears for the first time on the face of a final order, a party must alert the court of the error via a motion for rehearing or some other appropriate motion in order to preserve it for appeal."); Fla. Fam. L. R. P. 12.530(b) (requiring a motion for rehearing to be filed within fifteen days of the filing of a judgment in a non-jury trial); see also Furr v. Furr, 57 So. 3d 914, 914 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011) (explaining that an appellate court cannot consider a sufficiency of the evidence claim without a transcript); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979).

Rowe, M.K. Thomas, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Merz v. Merz

Florida District Court of Appeals
Feb 16, 2024
379 So. 3d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)
Case details for

Merz v. Merz

Case Details

Full title:Johnathan D. MERZ, Appellant, v. Harmony L. MERZ, Appellee.

Court:Florida District Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 16, 2024

Citations

379 So. 3d 531 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2024)