Opinion
Argued June 16, 1891
Decided June 25, 1891
James D. Bell for appellant.
Almet F. Jenks for respondent.
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Merz v. City of Brooklyn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1891
128 N.Y. 617 (N.Y. 1891)
Summaries of
Merz v. City of Brooklyn
Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 25, 1891
128 N.Y. 617 (N.Y. 1891)
Case details for
Merz v. City of Brooklyn
Case Details
Full title:MAX MERZ, Appellant, v . THE CITY OF BROOKLYN, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Jun 25, 1891
Citations
128 N.Y. 617 (N.Y. 1891)
38 N.Y. St. Rptr. 1014
Citing Cases
Squaw Island Freight T. Co., Inc., v. City of Buffalo
(See, also, Matter of Dasent, 2 N.Y.S. 609; Williams v. City of Buffalo, 14 N.Y. St. Repr. 81; Penfield v.…
Simmons v. City of BrooklynJanuary Term, 1896. Judgment affirmed, with costs, on the authority of Curry v. City of Buffalo ( 135 N.Y.…