From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merritte v. Kessell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Oct 6, 2015
Case No. 12-cv-00263-JPG-PMF (S.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 2015)

Opinion

Case No. 12-cv-00263-JPG-PMF

10-06-2015

CALVIN MERRITTE, # R-53322, Plaintiff, v. C/O KESSELL, et. al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff's Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 212) denying Plaintiff's Motion to Issue Subpoena (Doc. 211) as the Plaintiff sought production of documents outside the 100 mile limit set forth at Rule 45(c)(2)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

As stated in Magistrate Judge Frazier's Order: "Although attorneys may issue subpoenas on their own, pro se litigants must have their subpoenas issued through the Court Clerk. Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(a)(3)." At the time Plaintiff filed his Motion to Issue Subpoenas and his Objection to the denial of his motion, he was pro se. Subsequently, Plaintiff has been appointed counsel and his attorney may issue subpoenas he believes necessary without approval of the Court.

As such, Plaintiff's Pro Se Objection (Doc. 213) to Magistrate Judge's Order (Doc. 212) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: 10/6/2015

s/J . Phil Gilbert

J. PHIL GILBERT

DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Merritte v. Kessell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
Oct 6, 2015
Case No. 12-cv-00263-JPG-PMF (S.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 2015)
Case details for

Merritte v. Kessell

Case Details

Full title:CALVIN MERRITTE, # R-53322, Plaintiff, v. C/O KESSELL, et. al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Date published: Oct 6, 2015

Citations

Case No. 12-cv-00263-JPG-PMF (S.D. Ill. Oct. 6, 2015)