From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merritt v. State

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Aug 20, 1985
369 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

No. C7-85-421.

June 18, 1985. Review Denied August 20, 1985.

Appeal from the District Court, Ramsey County, Harold W. Schultz, J.

William Wallace Merritt, pro se.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Tom Foley, Ramsey County Atty., Steven C. DeCoster, Asst. County Atty., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by POPOVICH, C.J., and NIERENGARTEN and RANDALL, JJ., with oral argument waived.


SUMMARY OPINION


FACTS

Appellant William Wallace Merritt was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree in Hennepin County and was sentenced to a term of 43 months. Subsequently he was convicted of criminal sexual conduct in the first degree in Ramsey County and was given a 43 month sentence consecutive to the Hennepin County sentence. Appellant petitioned for post-conviction relief claiming there was no written reason filed to justify the consecutive sentence. The post-conviction court denied appellant's requested relief stating that under Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.F. the court may use consecutive sentencing where defendant is convicted of different felonies for crimes against different persons. Appellant appeals from the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.

DECISION

Consecutive sentencing was authorized by the guidelines and its use did not constitute a departure requiring a departure report. Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines II.F.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Merritt v. State

Minnesota Court of Appeals
Aug 20, 1985
369 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

Merritt v. State

Case Details

Full title:William Wallace MERRITT, Petitioner, Appellant, v. STATE of Minnesota…

Court:Minnesota Court of Appeals

Date published: Aug 20, 1985

Citations

369 N.W.2d 329 (Minn. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

State v. Roth

The rule has been expressly applied to criminal sexual conduct convictions. Merritt v. State, 369 N.W.2d 329…