From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merrill v. Winans

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
116 N.J.L. 90 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Submitted October 25, 1935 —

Decided January 31, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 526.

For the appellant, Earle A. Merrill.

For the respondent, Frederick A. Pope.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Merrill v. Winans

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
116 N.J.L. 90 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Merrill v. Winans

Case Details

Full title:EARLE A. MERRILL, APPELLANT, v. JOHN WINANS, RESPONDENT

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1936

Citations

116 N.J.L. 90 (N.J. 1936)
182 A. 626

Citing Cases

Tomnitz v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.

S. 621; Meade Fiber Corp. v. Starnes, 247 S.W. 989; Peru Plow Co. v. Industrial Comm., 142 N.E. 546; Iwanicki…

Taylor Dredging Co. v. Travelers Ins. Co.

" The notion of an accidental cause is not susceptible of precise definition, though it has been stated that…