From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mero v. Berlin

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
May 5, 2023
22-cv-544-SE (D.N.H. May. 5, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-544-SE

05-05-2023

Jhonny Enrique Arcentales Mero v. FCI Berlin, Warden


ORDER

SAMANTHA D. ELLIOTT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

No objection having been filed, I herewith approve the Endorsed Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone dated April 7, 2023, and deny the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 7) as moot, and also dismiss this case as moot, see Francis v. Maloney, 798 F.3d 33, 38 (1st Cir. 2015).

“[O]nly those issues fairly raised by the objections to the magistrate's report are subject to review in the district court and those not preserved by such objection are precluded on appeal.” Sch. Union No. 37 v. United Nat'l Ins. Co., 617 F.3d 554, 564 (1st Cir. 2010) (quotation omitted); see United States v. Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4, 6 (1st Cir. 1986) (after proper notice, failure to file a specific objection to magistrate's report will waive the right to appeal).

The clerk is directed to enter judgment and close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mero v. Berlin

United States District Court, D. New Hampshire
May 5, 2023
22-cv-544-SE (D.N.H. May. 5, 2023)
Case details for

Mero v. Berlin

Case Details

Full title:Jhonny Enrique Arcentales Mero v. FCI Berlin, Warden

Court:United States District Court, D. New Hampshire

Date published: May 5, 2023

Citations

22-cv-544-SE (D.N.H. May. 5, 2023)