From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merino v. St. Joaquing GN Hosp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2023
2:22-cv-00520 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-00520 WBS DB P

12-20-2023

FRANCISCO MERINO, Plaintiff, v. ST. JOAQUING GN HOSPITAL, Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On April 3, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 41.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed April 3, 2023 (ECF No. 41) are adopted in full; and

2. Plaintiff's motions for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 35, 38) are denied.


Summaries of

Merino v. St. Joaquing GN Hosp.

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 20, 2023
2:22-cv-00520 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2023)
Case details for

Merino v. St. Joaquing GN Hosp.

Case Details

Full title:FRANCISCO MERINO, Plaintiff, v. ST. JOAQUING GN HOSPITAL, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 20, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-00520 WBS DB P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 20, 2023)