dismissing claims for breach of contract for lack of jurisdiction because Cienega Gardens, et al. were not in privity of contract with the United States with regard to the prepayment option
Summary of this case from Chancellor Manor v. U.S.No. 98-1974.
October 4, 1999, October TERM, 1999.
C.A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 166 F. 3d 1114.
dismissing claims for breach of contract for lack of jurisdiction because Cienega Gardens, et al. were not in privity of contract with the United States with regard to the prepayment option
Summary of this case from Chancellor Manor v. U.S.describing congressional efforts to halt anticipated loss of affordable units to prepayment, and noting that use restrictions terminated on satisfaction of financing obligation insured by United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Summary of this case from Bd. of Appeals v. Ardemore ApartmentsFull title:MERGENS ET AL. v. DREYFOOS ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 4, 1999
As a threshold matter, this Court made no inquiry into Asbell's status as Robinson's former attorney at the…
WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK v. COXAlthough discussed in terms of the exercise of supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367, the…