From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meredith v. Mt. Pleasant Boat Bldg. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 15, 1985
286 S.C. 115 (S.C. 1985)

Opinion

22352

Heard March 13, 1985.

Decided July 15, 1985.

J. Kevin Holmes, of Steinberg, Levkoff, Spitz Goldberg, Charleston, for appellant. George E. Campsen, Jr., Charleston, for respondent.


Heard March 13, 1985.

Decided July 15, 1985.


In this breach of employment contract case, appellant employee sued his former employer, respondent boat company, to recover termination benefits he alleged were unconditionally due upon his dismissal. A non-jury trial resulted in judgment for the employer. We affirm.

The boat company had been in existence for seventy years and was financially strong and profitable when appellant was hired as its general manager. Under appellant's management, the business deteriorated to near bankruptcy resulting in appellant's dismissal.

The employer refused appellant's request for dismissal benefits because he had been terminated for cause.

The trial judge, without a jury, held appellant had breached the contract by mismanaging the company and no termination benefits were due him under the contract.

In an action at law tried non-jury, the trial judge's findings of fact will not be disturbed by us if there is any evidence to reasonably support his findings. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. The City of Greenville, 266 S.C. 81, 221 S.E.2d 773 (1976).

We hold the evidence supports the findings appellant breached the contract by mismanagement causing great loss to the company. Since an employee terminated for cause is not entitled to dismissal pay, Berry v. Goodyear Tire Rubber Company, 270 S.C. 489, 242 S.E.2d 551 (1978), we hold judgment was properly entered for the employer.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Meredith v. Mt. Pleasant Boat Bldg. Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jul 15, 1985
286 S.C. 115 (S.C. 1985)
Case details for

Meredith v. Mt. Pleasant Boat Bldg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:J.C. MEREDITH, JR., Appellant, v. MT. PLEASANT BOAT BUILDING CO., INC.…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jul 15, 1985

Citations

286 S.C. 115 (S.C. 1985)
333 S.E.2d 565

Citing Cases

Schuermann v. American Ka-Ro Corp.

Employee concedes that he was terminated for cause and acknowledges the general rule that an employee's…

Branco v. Hull Storey Retail Grp.

"[W]here a law case is tried by a judge without a jury, his findings of fact have the force and effect of a…