From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merck v. Minn. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 5, 2019
Civil No. 18-3246 (DWF/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2019)

Opinion

Civil No. 18-3246 (DWF/BRT)

02-05-2019

Kevin M. Merck, Plaintiff, v. Minnesota Supreme Court, Minnesota Court of Appeals, Minnesota District Court Second, Ramsey County, and Washington County, Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court upon Plaintiff Kevin M. Merck's ("Plaintiff" objections (Doc. No. 6) to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson's January 2, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 5) insofar as it recommends that this action be dismissed with prejudice.

The factual background for the above-entitled matter is clearly and precisely set forth in the Report and Recommendation and is incorporated by reference for purposes of Plaintiff's objections. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge concluded that Plaintiff, while qualified financially for IFP status, has failed to state a claim on which relief can be granted. Specifically, the Magistrate Judge held that the Complaint fails to properly plead official-capacity claims against any Defendant, and even if it did, the "gravamen of [Plaintiff's] allegations . . . utterly fail to show any due-process violations." (Doc. No. 5 at 7.)

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record, including a review of the arguments and submissions of counsel, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 72.2(b). After carefully considering Plaintiff's objections, the Court finds no reason to depart from the Magistrate Judge's recommendation. Based upon the de novo review of the record and all of the arguments and submissions of the parties and the Court being otherwise duly advised in the premises, the Court hereby enters the following:

ORDER

1. Plaintiff Kevin M. Merck's objections (Doc. No. [6]) to Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson's January 2, 2019 Report and Recommendation are OVERRULED.

2. Magistrate Judge Becky R. Thorson's January 2, 2019 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. [5]) is ADOPTED.

3. This action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Dated: February 5, 2019

s/Donovan W. Frank

DONOVAN W. FRANK

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Merck v. Minn. Supreme Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Feb 5, 2019
Civil No. 18-3246 (DWF/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2019)
Case details for

Merck v. Minn. Supreme Court

Case Details

Full title:Kevin M. Merck, Plaintiff, v. Minnesota Supreme Court, Minnesota Court of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Feb 5, 2019

Citations

Civil No. 18-3246 (DWF/BRT) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2019)