From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Apotex Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 10, 2013
517 F. App'x 939 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Opinion

2012-1516 2012-1543

06-10-2013

MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Formerly known as Schering Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. APOTEX INC. AND APOTEX CORP., Defendants-Cross Appellants.

RICHARD L. STANLEY, Law Office of Richard Stanley, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief were PAUL D. MATUKAITIS, EDWARD W. MURRAY and MARY J. MORRY, Merick & Co. Inc., of Rahway, New Jersey; and NICOLAS G. BARZOUKAS, JOSHUA P. DAVIS, AUDREY L. MANESS and JUSTIN CONSTANT, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Houston, Texas; and JOHN F. LYNCH, of Port Ludlow, Washington. Of counsel were JILLIAN A. CENTANNI, DAVID E. DELORENZI and SHEILA F. MCSHANE, of Gibbons, P.C., of Newark, NJ; and KEVIN S. KUDLAC, and RENER TREVIN, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Houston, Texas. DEANNE M. MAZZOCHI, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were WILLIAM A. RAKOCZY, PAUL J. MOLINOM, ANDREW M. ALUL, ROY CHAMCHARAS, MATTHEW V. ANDERSON and YIXIN H. TANG. Of counsel was ARNOLD B. CALMANN, Saiber LLC, of Newark, New Jersey


NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in No. 09-CV-6373, Judge Peter G. Sheridan.

JUDGMENT

RICHARD L. STANLEY, Law Office of Richard Stanley, of Houston, Texas, argued for plaintiff-appellant. On the brief were PAUL D. MATUKAITIS, EDWARD W. MURRAY and MARY J. MORRY, Merick & Co. Inc., of Rahway, New Jersey; and NICOLAS G. BARZOUKAS, JOSHUA P. DAVIS, AUDREY L. MANESS and JUSTIN CONSTANT, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Houston, Texas; and JOHN F. LYNCH, of Port Ludlow, Washington. Of counsel were JILLIAN A. CENTANNI, DAVID E. DELORENZI and SHEILA F. MCSHANE, of Gibbons, P.C., of Newark, NJ; and KEVIN S. KUDLAC, and RENER TREVIN, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, of Houston, Texas.

DEANNE M. MAZZOCHI, Rakoczy Molino Mazzochi Siwik LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-cross appellants. With him on the brief were WILLIAM A. RAKOCZY, PAUL J. MOLINOM, ANDREW M. ALUL, ROY CHAMCHARAS, MATTHEW V. ANDERSON and YIXIN H. TANG. Of counsel was ARNOLD B. CALMANN, Saiber LLC, of Newark, New Jersey THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (DYK, CLEVENGER, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

_________________

Jan Horbaly

Clerk


Summaries of

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Apotex Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Jun 10, 2013
517 F. App'x 939 (Fed. Cir. 2013)
Case details for

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Apotex Inc.

Case Details

Full title:MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP., Formerly known as Schering Corporation…

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Jun 10, 2013

Citations

517 F. App'x 939 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

Citing Cases

Sharp v. Teva Pharms. U.S., Inc.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's decision on June 10, 2013. See Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v.…

Sharp v. Teva Pharms. U.S., Inc.

Merck argues that the need for three peaks only applies to the x-ray crystallographic powder diffraction…