From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

MERCHANT v. MONT. CT. CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCE AGEN

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 6, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-347 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 6, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-347.

December 6, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz (Doc. #3), to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and noting that no objections have been filed thereto and that the time for filing such objections under Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b) expired on November 22, 2006, hereby ADOPTS said Report and Recommendations.

On November 9, 2006, Plaintiff filed a letter (Doc. No. 4) asking to have his case heard by a jury, but he made no objections to the law cited by the Magistrate Judge.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Complaint herein be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine as to Plaintiff's request to have this Court review any decisions of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, with prejudice for any claims against the Juvenile Court Magistrates in their individual capacities, without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted as to the Child Support Enforcement Agencies and the magistrates in their official capacities, and without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1367 as to Defendant Davis Mesaros.


Summaries of

MERCHANT v. MONT. CT. CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCE AGEN

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton
Dec 6, 2006
Case No. 3:06-cv-347 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 6, 2006)
Case details for

MERCHANT v. MONT. CT. CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCE AGEN

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD R. MERCHANT, Plaintiff, v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division at Dayton

Date published: Dec 6, 2006

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-347 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 6, 2006)