From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merced v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 3, 2023
2:21-cv-01405-WBS-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-01405-WBS-JDP (PC)

07-03-2023

JUAN AUTILANO MERCED Jr., Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On May 18, 2023, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed May 18, 2023, are adopted in full; and
2. The Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Brazil is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Merced v. Covello

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jul 3, 2023
2:21-cv-01405-WBS-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2023)
Case details for

Merced v. Covello

Case Details

Full title:JUAN AUTILANO MERCED Jr., Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jul 3, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-01405-WBS-JDP (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jul. 3, 2023)