Opinion
March 4, 2008.
Attorney and Client — Malpractice-Damages.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Mercantile v. Morrison
Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Mar 4, 2008
19 Misc. 3d 1121 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
Summaries of
Mercantile v. Morrison
Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Mar 4, 2008
19 Misc. 3d 1121 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
Case details for
Mercantile v. Morrison
Case Details
Full title:Mercantile Capital Partners Fund, LP v. Morrison Cohen LLP
Court:Supreme Court of the State of New York. New York County
Date published: Mar 4, 2008
Citations
19 Misc. 3d 1121 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 2008)
2008 N.Y. Slip Op. 50795
Citing Cases
Sang Lan v. Time Warner, Inc.
"To satisfy the element of proximate causation, a plaintiff must preliminarily plead and ultimately prove…
Sang Lan v. Time Warner, Inc.Attorney malpractice requires "but for" causation; that is, "[t]o satisfy the element of proximate causation,…