From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mercado v. Harbor Grp. Mgmt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
1:21-CV-5568 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)

Opinion

1:21-CV-5568 (LTS)

12-01-2021

JANITA MARIE MERCADO, Plaintiff, v. HARBOR GROUP MANAGEMENT, Defendant.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

By order dated August 26, 2021, the Court granted Plaintiff leave to file an amended complaint within 60 days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii).

The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).

Plaintiff has consented to electronic service of court documents. (ECF 4.)

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mercado v. Harbor Grp. Mgmt.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 1, 2021
1:21-CV-5568 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)
Case details for

Mercado v. Harbor Grp. Mgmt.

Case Details

Full title:JANITA MARIE MERCADO, Plaintiff, v. HARBOR GROUP MANAGEMENT, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 1, 2021

Citations

1:21-CV-5568 (LTS) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 1, 2021)