From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Meraz-Espinoza v. Santoyo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 24, 2024
23-cv-05947-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2024)

Opinion

23-cv-05947-WHO (PR)

04-24-2024

MOISES MERAZ-ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. H. SANTOYO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILLIAM H. ORRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff Moises Meraz-Espinoza has not complied with my instructions to file an amended complaint by April 8, 2024. Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) for failing to comply with my instructions and for failing to prosecute, see Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).

Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Meraz-Espinoza may move to reopen. Any such motion must (i) have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page; and (ii) contain an amended complaint that complies with the instructions in the order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Meraz-Espinoza v. Santoyo

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Apr 24, 2024
23-cv-05947-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Meraz-Espinoza v. Santoyo

Case Details

Full title:MOISES MERAZ-ESPINOZA, Plaintiff, v. H. SANTOYO, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Apr 24, 2024

Citations

23-cv-05947-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Apr. 24, 2024)