From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Merancy v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
May 22, 2012
No. 10cv1982 (MRK) (D. Conn. May. 22, 2012)

Opinion

No. 10cv1982 (MRK)

05-22-2012

LORI ANN MERANCY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


RULING AND ORDER

Upon review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rule 72.2 of the Local Rules for United States Magistrate Judges (D. Conn.), and in the absence of any objection from either party, the Court APPROVES AND ACCEPTS United States Magistrate Judge William I. Garfinkel's Recommended Ruling on Pending Motions [doc. # 27]. For the reasons set forth in detail in the Recommended Ruling, the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Affirm [doc. # 25] and DENIES Plaintiff Lori Ann Merancy's Motion to Remand [doc. # 16]. The Court directs the Clerk to enter judgment for the Defendant and to close this file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Mark R. Kravitz

United States District Judge Dated at New Haven, Connecticut: May 22, 2012.


Summaries of

Merancy v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
May 22, 2012
No. 10cv1982 (MRK) (D. Conn. May. 22, 2012)
Case details for

Merancy v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:LORI ANN MERANCY, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

Date published: May 22, 2012

Citations

No. 10cv1982 (MRK) (D. Conn. May. 22, 2012)