From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mente v. Rogers

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 19, 2024
CV 24-04470-SPG-SK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)

Opinion

CV 24-04470-SPG-SK

07-19-2024

Michael Mente v. Traveon Rogers et al


Present: The Honorable SHERILYN PEACE GARNETTUNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Proceeding: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER

Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (Court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion).

The below time period(s) has not been met. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, orders Plaintiff(s) to show cause, in writing, on or before July 29, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. This matter will stand submitted upon the filing of Plaintiff(s) response. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 78. Failure to respond will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.

Defendants listed below did not answer the complaint, yet Plaintiff have failed to request entry of default, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(a). Plaintiff can satisfy this order by seeking entry of default or by dismissing the complaint.

• Traveon Rogers
• Scott Oliver
• Scott Oliver Law LLC

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mente v. Rogers

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jul 19, 2024
CV 24-04470-SPG-SK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)
Case details for

Mente v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:Michael Mente v. Traveon Rogers et al

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jul 19, 2024

Citations

CV 24-04470-SPG-SK (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2024)