From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Menkes v. Beth Abraham Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2011
89 A.D.3d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)

Opinion

2011-11-29

Sheryl MENKES, etc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. BETH ABRAHAM SERVICES, Defendant–Respondent.

Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for appellant. Wenick & Finger, P.C., New York (Frank J. Wenick of counsel), for respondent.


Alexander J. Wulwick, New York, for appellant. Wenick & Finger, P.C., New York (Frank J. Wenick of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Barry Salman, J.), entered June 17, 2010, which, to the extent appealed from, granted the motion of defendant nursing home and nonparty former nursing director to quash a subpoena seeking the deposition of the former nursing director, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion, as plaintiff failed to demonstrate that the information sought from the former director could not be obtained from other sources, such as the nursing home's own records ( see Connolly v. Napoli, Kaiser & Bern, LLP, 81 A.D.3d 530, 531, 917 N.Y.S.2d 175 [2011]; Kooper v. Kooper, 74 A.D.3d 6, 15, 16–17, 901 N.Y.S.2d 312 [2010] ). In view of the foregoing, we need not determine whether the disclosure sought is material and necessary.

SAXE, J.P., FRIEDMAN, RENWICK, DeGRASSE, FREEDMAN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Menkes v. Beth Abraham Servs.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.
Nov 29, 2011
89 A.D.3d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
Case details for

Menkes v. Beth Abraham Servs.

Case Details

Full title:Sheryl MENKES, etc., Plaintiff–Appellant, v. BETH ABRAHAM SERVICES…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

Date published: Nov 29, 2011

Citations

89 A.D.3d 647 (N.Y. App. Div. 2011)
2011 N.Y. Slip Op. 8659
933 N.Y.S.2d 548

Citing Cases

Schorr v. Schorr

The court providently exercised its discretion in granting the motion to quash the subpoenas. Defendant…

Retamozzo v. State

Where disclosure is sought from a nonparty, the requirements imposed on the party seeking disclosure are…