From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 14, 2024
4:22-cv-04862-YGR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)

Opinion

4:22-cv-04862-YGR

02-14-2024

Sury L. Mendoza, Plaintiff, v. Nissan North America, Inc. and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.


ORDER OF CONDITIONAL DISMISSAL

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

On January 5, 2024, parties filed a notice that settlement has been reached in this action and that they intended to file a joint stipulation to dismiss after resolution of a motion on attorneys' fees and expenses. (Dkt. No. 28.)

Parties did not timely file such a motion in accordance with this Court's prior order. (See Dkt. No. 29.) Given the lack of motion and in light of the above-refenced notice, this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that if any party certifies to the Court, with proper notice to all other parties, by no later than May 3, 2024, that the case should be reopened, this order shall be vacated and this case shall be restored to the calendar for further proceedings.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Feb 14, 2024
4:22-cv-04862-YGR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Nissan N. Am., Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Sury L. Mendoza, Plaintiff, v. Nissan North America, Inc. and DOES 1…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Feb 14, 2024

Citations

4:22-cv-04862-YGR (N.D. Cal. Feb. 14, 2024)