From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Keeter

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 24, 2024
24-cv-00663-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2024)

Opinion

24-cv-00663-WHO (PR)

07-24-2024

JERRY PHILLIP MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. MICHELLE KEETER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL

WILIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge.

Mail sent by the Court to plaintiff Mendoza was returned as undeliverable more than 60 days ago. (Dkt. No. 13.) Accordingly, this federal civil rights action is DISMISSED (without prejudice) because Mendoza failed to keep the Court apprised of his current address pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b) and because he failed to prosecute his suit, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Mendoza may move to reopen the action. Any motion to reopen must have the words MOTION TO REOPEN written on the first page.

The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, and close the file.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Keeter

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jul 24, 2024
24-cv-00663-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2024)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Keeter

Case Details

Full title:JERRY PHILLIP MENDOZA, Plaintiff, v. MICHELLE KEETER, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jul 24, 2024

Citations

24-cv-00663-WHO (PR) (N.D. Cal. Jul. 24, 2024)