Opinion
NO. S-1-SC-37377
10-31-2019
PETER DEAN MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. GERMAN FRANCO, Warden, and STATE OF NEW MEXICO, Respondents.
Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender C. David Henderson, Appellate Defender MJ Edge, Assistant Appellate Defender Santa Fe, NM for Petitioner Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General Margaret Jayne Crabb, Assistant Attorney General Santa Fe, NM for Respondents
This decision of the Supreme Court of New Mexico was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Refer to Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished decisions. Electronic decisions may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official version filed by the Supreme Court. ORIGINAL PROCEEDING ON CERTIORARI
James Lawrence Sanchez, District Judge Bennett J. Baur, Chief Public Defender
C. David Henderson, Appellate Defender
MJ Edge, Assistant Appellate Defender
Santa Fe, NM for Petitioner Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General
Margaret Jayne Crabb, Assistant Attorney General
Santa Fe, NM for Respondents
DISPOSITIONAL ORDER OF REVERSAL
{1} WHEREAS, this matter having come before the Court upon our grant, pursuant to Rule 12-501 NMRA, of Petitioner Peter Mendoza's petition for writ of certiorari seeking review of the district court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus; and {2} The Court having considered the briefs and being otherwise fully informed on the issues and applicable law; and {3} The Court finding that there is no reasonable likelihood that a decision or formal opinion of the Court, under the instant facts, would materially advance the law of the State; and {4} The Court exercising its discretion under Rule 12-405(B)(1), (2) NMRA to dispose of a case by order, decision, or memorandum opinion rather than formal opinion; {5} NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the decision of the district court to dismiss Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is reversed, that one of Petitioner's convictions of NMSA 1978, Section 30-7-16 (2001) is vacated, and that this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.
{6} IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ _________
JUDITH K. NAKAMURA, Chief Justice
/s/ _________
BARBARA J. VIGIL, Justice
/s/ _________
MICHAEL E. VIGIL, Justice
/s/ _________
C. SHANNON BACON, Justice
/s/ _________
DAVID K. THOMSON, Justice