From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendoza v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 28, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2013)

Opinion

No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DAD P

01-28-2013

ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding through counsel with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On January 22, 2013, petitioner filed a request to modify the briefing schedule set forth in this court's order dated December 18, 2012. This is petitioner's third request for a modification of the briefing schedule. Good cause appearing, that request will be granted. However, no further modifications of the briefing schedule or extensions of time to comply therewith will be granted to petitioner absent a showing of extraordinary cause.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. On or before March 1, 2013, petitioner may file a motion to expand the record or any other motion he deems appropriate in order to proceed with this action;

2. Respondent shall file an opposition to petitioner's motion, if any, on or before April 1, 2013;

3. Petitioner may file a reply to respondent's opposition on or before April 15, 2013.

4. The hearing currently scheduled for March 15, 2013 is vacated.

5. A hearing on petitioner's motion filed pursuant to this order shall be held on May 3, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. in courtroom #27.

_______________

DALE A. DROZD

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Mendoza v. Cate

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 28, 2013
No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2013)
Case details for

Mendoza v. Cate

Case Details

Full title:ARQUIMEDES MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. MATTHEW CATE, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 28, 2013

Citations

No. 2:09-cv-1710 MCE DAD P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2013)