From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Warden, FCI Herlong

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 26, 2023
2:23-cv-0487 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0487 KJN P

04-26-2023

MIGUEL MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI HERLONG, Respondent.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

By an order filed March 21, 2023, petitioner was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or to pay the appropriate filing fee, within thirty days, or his application would be dismissed. The thirty day period has expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court's order, has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit, and has not paid the appropriate filing fee.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, petitioner may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Petitioner is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Mendez v. Warden, FCI Herlong

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Apr 26, 2023
2:23-cv-0487 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2023)
Case details for

Mendez v. Warden, FCI Herlong

Case Details

Full title:MIGUEL MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. WARDEN, FCI HERLONG, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Apr 26, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-0487 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 26, 2023)