From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mendez v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2020
Case No. EDCV 17-1020-JLS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. EDCV 17-1020-JLS (JEM)

05-04-2020

VICTOR MARK MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the pleadings, the records on file, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has filed Objections, and the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing the action with prejudice. Dated: May 04, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPHINE L. STATON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Mendez v. Paramo

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
May 4, 2020
Case No. EDCV 17-1020-JLS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2020)
Case details for

Mendez v. Paramo

Case Details

Full title:VICTOR MARK MENDEZ, Petitioner, v. DANIEL PARAMO, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: May 4, 2020

Citations

Case No. EDCV 17-1020-JLS (JEM) (C.D. Cal. May. 4, 2020)